Fellowship Referendum Card Title Mismatch: How To Fix It

by Admin 57 views
Fellowship Referendum Card Title Mismatch: How to Fix It

Hey guys, let's dive into a little hiccup we've found in the Fellowship dashboard. This is a common issue when developing and it's super important to address it correctly. Basically, the title on the referendum card for a Retention referendum doesn't always match the rank specified by the referendum's track origin. Let's break down this issue, how to reproduce it, the expected behavior, the actual behavior, and how to fix this title mismatch. This is a crucial area in the user experience, so fixing this will make things much smoother for everyone. We'll be using the provided database and screenshots to help you guys understand the problem.

The Problem: Referendum Card Titles vs. Track Origins

So, the core of the issue is this: when a user sees a referendum on the Fellowship dashboard, the title on the referendum card should perfectly reflect the rank the referendum is targeting. However, due to a bug, the card title is, instead, pulling the user's current rank. This leads to confusion, because when the user opens the modal (the detailed view), the correct rank, derived from the referendum's track origin, is displayed. This inconsistency is not just a cosmetic issue; it can lead to misunderstandings about the referendum's purpose.

Let me give you an example to make this super clear. Imagine a user with Rank I. A referendum is created to evaluate their retention, with the target being II Dan. On the main dashboard, the referendum card might incorrectly say something like, "Should User be retained at Rank I?" – completely off base. But, when the user clicks to view the details in the modal, it correctly shows "Retain at II Dan." This is the mismatch we're talking about, and it needs to be fixed. This discrepancy can be confusing and undermine the clarity of the platform. We need to ensure that the card title accurately reflects the intended retention rank.

This isn't just about a simple typo; it is about how information is presented to the user. Clear and accurate information is the foundation of a good user experience. This issue shows the importance of consistent data display in the user interface. We need to focus on this so that everyone can interact with the system without confusion.

The Importance of Accurate Referendum Titles

Why is this important, you ask? Well, it's all about clarity and trust. When users see a referendum, they need to quickly grasp what's being decided. An inaccurate title makes it hard for them to get the right information, leading to frustration and potential errors. We want our users to feel confident in the information they're seeing. This attention to detail is essential for a good user experience and maintaining trust in the platform. A well-designed system, which presents accurate information, builds trust with its users. That's why we're so focused on this fix. The small details matter, especially when it comes to user trust and a seamless experience. If you are a developer, then you know this is essential for code quality.

Steps to Reproduce the Issue: How to Find the Bug

Alright, let's get down to the nitty-gritty and see how to reproduce this issue. It's like a treasure hunt, but instead of gold, we're looking for a bug! Here's how to recreate the problem step-by-step. By following these steps, you can pinpoint the exact place where the card title generation goes wrong. This will help you to verify that the fix works.

  1. Import the Database: First things first, you'll need the database file provided, fellowship.json. Import this database and select the fellowship account. This database holds the data needed to see the problem firsthand. Make sure the database is correctly set up so you have all the necessary data. If this step isn't done correctly, the other steps won't work.

  2. Navigate to the Fellowship Page: Next, go to the Fellowship page in the application. This is where you'll see the referendum cards. The Fellowship page is the place where all the magic happens.

  3. Locate the Referendum: Find the specific referendum, the one with the title "Should 5C5Jo...7VyiM be retained at Rank I?". This is the specific referendum we are using to reproduce the issue. It's the test case for the bug. Be sure to select the correct referendum.

  4. Observe the Title: Carefully examine the title of the referendum card. Does it show the correct target rank based on the referendum's creation? If it shows the user's current rank instead, then we have found the bug. It will be immediately obvious if it is showing the wrong information. Take note of what is displayed.

  5. Open the Modal: Click on the referendum card to open the modal (the details view). This is where the discrepancy will become clear. By opening the modal, you get access to more detailed information about the referendum. Inside the modal, pay attention to the title. It should reflect the correct target rank from the referendum's creation. Check to ensure the modal title uses the correct information.

  6. Verify the Mismatch: If the modal title is different from the card title, you have confirmed the bug. If the card title doesn't match the referendum's track origin but the modal does, then the bug is confirmed. If you get here, you have successfully reproduced the issue. You should see the difference between the card and modal titles.

These steps will help you confirm that the problem exists and verify any fix you implement. Getting the setup right is always the most important part of reproducing this issue.

Expected vs. Actual Behavior: What Should Happen

Okay, let's talk about what we expect to happen versus what actually happens. This is an important step in understanding and fixing the bug. By clearly outlining the discrepancies, we can develop a solution that addresses the root cause of the problem. We want to be sure that the user gets the right information.

Expected Behavior: The Ideal Scenario

In an ideal world, the referendum card title would display the correct target rank based on the referendum's creation. The card title should be consistent with the information used when the referendum was created. No matter the user's current rank, the card title needs to accurately reflect the referendum's objective. For example, if a referendum is about retaining someone at II Dan, both the card and modal should clearly state this. Both the card and the modal should use the same information. This means: the card title must match the track origin and target rank used when the referendum was created. The user's current rank is irrelevant in this context. The card and modal should provide consistent information, avoiding any confusion.

Actual Behavior: What's Really Happening

Unfortunately, the actual behavior deviates from this. Instead of showing the referendum's intended rank, the card title dynamically builds itself from the user's current rank. This is where the problem lies. The user's current rank is being used to generate the card title. This is causing a significant mismatch. Meanwhile, the modal correctly displays the track-origin-based target rank. The modal, in contrast, does show the correct information. The modal displays the track-origin-based target rank correctly. This inconsistency creates confusion, as the user sees conflicting information at a glance.

By comparing what should happen with what does happen, we can focus on the specific part of the code that needs to be fixed. The fix should ensure the card title displays the correct rank.

The Fix: Ensuring Consistent Referendum Titles

So, how do we fix this issue? The solution lies in modifying how the referendum card title is generated. The goal is to ensure the title correctly reflects the referendum's original target rank, not the user's current rank. This will give users a consistent and accurate experience. Here's a suggested approach to solving this problem:

  1. Identify the Title Generation Code: First, locate the code responsible for generating the referendum card titles. This might involve searching through the codebase for the relevant component or function. You'll need to know which code is responsible for rendering the card title. Check the code for the referendum card title generation. The first thing you'll need to do is to find the relevant code.

  2. Modify the Data Source: Currently, the card title is pulling the user's current rank. This needs to be changed. Instead of using the user's rank, the title should use the rank specified by the referendum's track origin. Make sure the title uses the data from the track origin to determine the correct target rank. The title generation code needs to be adjusted so that it uses data from the referendum itself.

  3. Implement the Correct Logic: Update the code to correctly fetch and display the target rank from the referendum's track origin. Ensure that the card title uses the target rank data. Ensure that the card title uses the information stored in the referendum object. The goal is to make sure the right rank is displayed. This ensures that the card title will be accurate and consistent.

  4. Test Thoroughly: After implementing the fix, thoroughly test the changes. Test it to make sure the titles are now correct. Verify that the card title accurately reflects the intended retention rank. Check that the card title matches the track origin data. Test the referendum with various user ranks and target ranks. This will ensure that the fix works correctly in all scenarios. Testing is essential to confirm that the fix has been implemented correctly.

  5. Review the Code: Have another developer review your code to ensure it's correct. It is a good practice to have your code reviewed. Peer review can help catch any potential issues or improvements that may have been missed during the initial implementation. Have someone else test the changes, too.

By following these steps, you can successfully fix the referendum card title mismatch and provide users with a more reliable experience.

Conclusion: Improving User Experience

Fixing this issue is a win for the user experience. By making sure that the referendum card titles are accurate, we're improving clarity, reducing confusion, and building trust. The user will have a better understanding of what the referendum is about. With clear and consistent information, the users can make informed decisions. We're ensuring that the information is correct and consistent. The user experience will be significantly improved. In the end, this seemingly small detail can lead to a much better experience for everyone. So, let's get those titles fixed!